MANILA, Philippines — The camp of Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) District Engineer Henry Alcantara denied accusations linking him to alleged ghost flood control projects in Bulacan, insisting he had no hand in the supposed scheme.
In a statement issued over the weekend, the Flaminiano Arroyo & Dueñas law firm, which represents Alcantara, said its client “maintains his innocence: he did not author these alleged ghost projects. Any wrongdoing was done behind his back, without his knowledge, acquiescence, or approval.”
DPWH engineer denies role in Bulacan flood control ‘ghost projects’
The statement directly counters claims that Alcantara was the “kingpin” of the controversial projects, which authorities are now investigating for possible irregularities.
DPWH engineer denies role in Bulacan flood control ‘ghost projects’, This news data comes from:http://erlvyiwan.com
“Engr. Alcantara will contest every accusation that he had supposedly participated in and/or benefitted from any unlawful scheme,” the law firm said, adding that he would exhaust all legal remedies, including challenging his summary dismissal from service.
The camp also vowed Alcantara’s cooperation with the ongoing investigation. “He will continue to assist the authorities in the investigation of these flood control ghost projects. We are confident that in due time, the truth will surface and Engr. Alcantara will be cleared of the baseless accusations levied against him,” the statement read.

- Gaza at 'breaking point,' says UN food agency chief after visit
- Mob burns Nigerian woman to death over Islam blasphemy claim — police
- South Korean prosecutors indict Yoon's wife, former PM
- Australia government condemns anti-immigration rally in Sydney
- Thailand’s next PM reaffirms fresh polls promise
- ChatGPT to get parental controls after teen's death
- Afghanistan earthquake kills more than 800
- Afghan quake death toll surges to over 2,200
- Marcos willing to submit to a lifestyle check
- 15 drug war victims cleared to join Duterte's ICC case